Literature review demonstrates potent in-vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates, highlighting its potential against multidrug-resistant strains.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presently represents approximately 30% of clinical isolates of S. aureus in the USA. Many strains are additionally resistant to erythromycin, 15- and 16-membered macrolides (e.g. azithromycin, spiramycin), clindamycin, aminoglycosides and/or quinolones. A review of the literature shows that quinupristin/dalfopristin, a semisynthetic derivative of pristinamycin, exhibits good in-vitro activity against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus and MRSA (mean MIC90 0.25-1.0 and 0.5-2.0 mg/L, respectively). Its in-vitro bacteriostatic activity is also unaffected by resistance phenotypes for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin or gentamicin. Among erythromycin-resistant MRSA strains, those with constitutive (macrolide and lincosamide) resistance are only 2-fold less sensitive as strains with inducible (14- and 15-membered macrolide only) resistance (MICs 0.5-1.0 and 0.25-1.0 mg/L, respectively). Quinupristin/dalfopristin is at least as active as vancomycin and more active than ciprofloxacin and erythromycin against MRSA. It generally has a more rapid bactericidal action than vancomycin and oxacillin against many strains of MRSA. The bactericidal activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin may be affected by macrolide resistance phenotype: S. aureus strains susceptible or inducibly resistant to macrolides are killed within 6 h, whereas a number of strains constitutively resistant to macrolides remain viable after 12 h. The clinical significance of this laboratory phenomenon requires investigation, possibly in additional animal models of infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Low et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: