Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Few population-based studies have examined the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on survival from childhood cancers, especially neuroblastic tumours (NT). This study investigated a possible association between SES and survival from NT in children diagnosed in northern England. Methods All 102 cases of NT, aged 0-14 years and diagnosed 1993-2014, were extracted from the population-based Northern Region Young Persons' Malignant Disease Registry. Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression were used to analyse survival in relation to paternal SES and clinical characteristics. Results Survival differed between age-groups, with infants having the least risk of death. Increased risk of death was seen for children diagnosed with International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage 4 neuroblastoma compared to stage 1, 2, 3 and 4S (HR=6.8; 95% CI: 2.8-16.6), MYCN amplified versus non-amplified (Hazard Ratio (HR)=3.4; 95% CI: 1.7-6.8) and high risk versus low and intermediate risk cases (HR=9.1; 95% CI: 3.2-25.9). There were no differences between paternal SES, gender, site of primary tumour, or diagnostic period. Conclusions This study did not find a socio-economic effect on survival from NT diagnosed in northern England. This contrasts with other studies of NT elsewhere in the world where socioeconomic inequality has been shown to affect outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: