Why the study?
ICA blood flow may be an alternative target to measure CVR and endothelium-dependent vasodilatory dysfunction, prompting investigation into the feasibility of testing CVR in the ICA during routine clinical carotid assessment.
Does the use of dynamic respiratory maneuvers during routine carotid duplex assessment provide a feasible and valid measure of cerebrovascular reactivity?
Does the use of dynamic respiratory maneuvers during routine carotid duplex assessment provide a feasible and valid measure of cerebrovascular reactivity?
Assessing cerebrovascular reactivity in the internal carotid artery using respiratory maneuvers during routine duplex ultrasound is feasible and reveals a greater tendency toward vasoconstriction in older patients.
Respiratory maneuvers appear feasible during routine carotid duplex; leaves open validation as a cerebrovascular reactivity measure.
Background: Internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow may be an alternative target to measure cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and endothelium-dependent vasodilatory dysfunction. We investigated the feasibility of testing CVR in the ICA during routine clinical carotid investigation. Methods: CVR was assessed by effects of breath-hold (BH) and rapid-breathing (RB) on ICA diameter, blood velocities (peak systolic velocity [PSV], end diastolic velocity [EDV], and mean velocity [MV]), volume flow, and relative to changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide (end-tidal CO 2 [etCO 2 ]; CVR PSV, CVR EDV , CVR MV , and CVR Flow ). Feasibility and validity were determined by data quality, agreement between challenges, and association with age. Results: In 50 patients (68 ± 13 years old, 15 female), recordings during rest, BH, and RB were of good quality in 96%, 90%, and 88%, respectively. Age-related reductions in blood velocities were evident during rest (EDV: r 2 = 0.37, P < 0.0001), BH (EDV: r 2 = 0.42, P < 0.001), and RB (EDV, r 2 = 0.50, P < 0.0001). During BH, the absolute changes in blood velocities (EDV: r 2 = 0.15, P < 0.01), etCO 2 ( r 2 = 0.10, P = 0.03), CVR EDV ( r 2 = 0.13, P = 0.02), and CVR MV ( r 2 = 0.11, P = 0.03) were smaller in older patients. In contrast, during RB, absolute changes in blood velocities and etCO 2 were not age related, but changes in volume flow ( r 2 = 0.12, P = 0.02), CVR MV ( r 2 = 0.11, P = 0.03), and CVR Flow ( r 2 = 0.16, P < 0.01) were greater in older patients. Conclusion: During routine carotid duplex assessment, assessing CVR in the ICA was feasible, practical, and associated with high quality recordings. Differential associations with age between hypercapnic and hypocapnic stimuli imply a greater tendency to vasoconstriction in older patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Llwyd et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: