Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inclusive fitness theory is central to our understanding of the evolution of social behavior. By showing the importance of genetic transmission through nondescendent relatives, it helps to explain the evolution of reproductively altruistic behaviors, such as those observed in the social insects. Inclusive fitness thinking is quantified by Hamilton's rule, but Hamilton's rule has often been criticized for being inexact or insufficiently general. Here I show how adopting a genic perspective yields a very general version that remains pleasingly simple and transparent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David C. Queller (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: