Eucalyptus species are characterised by substantial genetically predetermined withinand between-tree variations in wood anatomical features including fibre and vessel dimensions. This effect of genotype outweighs that of growing conditions; indeed the influence on wood anatomy of rate of growth per se is minor. It must therefore be assumed that the reputed difference in wood quality between regrowth/plantation stands and old growth forests is founded on non-anatomical features, or reflects simply the greater proportion of juvenile wood in small, rapidly grown stems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Wilkes (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: