Why the study?
No research focuses on the acceptability and feasibility of older Indigenous people using wearables for early atrial fibrillation detection.
Does a co-designed wearable device programme supported by online health education groups improve early detection and timely referral of atrial fibrillation, as well as heart health self-efficacy and health literacy, compared with standard care in Indigenous Australian adults aged 55 years and older with hypertension?
Does a co-designed wearable device programme supported by online health education groups improve early detection and timely referral of atrial fibrillation, as well as heart health self-efficacy and health literacy, compared with standard care in Indigenous Australian adults aged 55 years and older with hypertension?
This mixed-methods protocol establishes the first co-designed, culturally safe framework with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of wearable devices for early atrial fibrillation detection and management in older Indigenous Australians.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol tests wearables for AF detection in older Indigenous adults; leaves open acceptability, feasibility, and effects on self-efficacy.
INTRODUCTION: Digital health technologies have the potential to provide cost-effective care to remote and underserved populations. To realise this potential, research must involve people not traditionally included. No research focuses on the acceptability and feasibility of older Indigenous people using wearables for early atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. This protocol compares digital augmentation against standard practice to detect AF, evaluate heart health self-efficacy and health literacy changes and identify barriers in collaboration with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations. It will establish a framework for implementing culturally safe and acceptable wearable programmes for detecting and managing AF in Indigenous adults ≥55 years and older. METHODS: This mixed-methods research will use the Rambaldini model of collective impact, a user-centred, co-design methodology and yarning circles, a recognised Indigenous research methodology to assess the cultural safety, acceptability, feasibility and efficacy of incorporating wearables into standard care for early AF detection. ANALYSIS: Qualitative data will be analysed to create composite descriptions of participants' experiences and perspectives related to comfort, cultural safety, convenience, confidence, family reactions and concerns. Quantitative device data will be extracted and analysed via Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS). CONCLUSION: Prioritising perspectives of older Indigenous adults on using wearables for detecting and monitoring cardiovascular disease will ensure that the findings are effective, relevant and acceptable to those impacted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Findings will be published in open-source peer-reviewed journals, shared at professional conferences, described in lay terms and made available to the public. The AHMRC HREC Reference Number approved 1135/15.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henson et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: