This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Many novel vaginal/rectal microbicide formulations failed clinically due to safety concerns, indicating the need for the early investigation of lead microbicide formulations. In this study, the preclinical safety of an HIV-1 gp120 and mannose responsive microbicide delivery system (MRP) is evaluated in C57BL/6 mice. MRP was engineered through the layer-by-layer coating of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) with Canavalia ensiformis lectin (Con A) and glycogen. MRP mean particle diameter and zeta potential were 857.8 ± 93.1 nm and 2.37 ± 4.12 mV, respectively. Tenofovir (TFV) encapsulation and loading efficiencies in MRP were 70.1% and 16.3% w/w, respectively. When exposed to HIV-1 rgp120 (25 μg/mL), MRP released a significant amount of TFV (∼5-fold higher) in vaginal and seminal fluid mixture compared to the control (pre-exposure) level (∼59 μg/mL) in vaginal fluid alone. Unlike the positive control treated groups (e.g., nonoxynol-9), no significant histological damages and CD45+ cells infiltration were observed in the vaginal and major reproductive organ epithelial layers. This was probably due to MRP biocompatibility and its isosmolality (304.33 ± 0.58 mOsm/kg). Furthermore, compared to negative controls, there was no statistically significant increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL1α, Ilβ, IL7, IP10, and TNFα. Collectively, these data suggest that MRP is a relatively safe nanotemplate for HIV-1 gp120 stimuli responsive vaginal microbicide delivery system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coulibaly et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: