The definitional move of linking environmental concerns to security concerns has been promoted by those seeking greater salience for environmental issues and opposed by those suspicious of a move to ‘securitize’ environmental discourse. This essay reviews and critiques the arguments for and against this definitional change based on the degree to which they functionally view definitional argument as a strategy rather than as a truth claim.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenneth Broda-Bahm (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: