Why the study?
Brain fog is commonly reported in more than a dozen chronic diseases, but its definition, nature, and objective correlates remain unclear.
This review highlights that 'brain fog' is a transdiagnostic term conflating cognition, fatigue, and affect, suggesting future research should disambiguate these phenomena.
Brain fog's transdiagnostic symptoms warrant clinical recognition across chronic diseases; leaves open standardized definitions and objective correlates.
'Brain fog' is commonly reported in more than a dozen chronic diseases, but what is it? We review research across conditions which has characterised brain fog and evaluate its definitions and objective correlates. Brain fog has been used to refer to a variable set of overlapping symptoms implicating cognition, fatigue, and affect. It has been defined as a distinct symptom, a syndrome, or a nonspecific term. We consider the evidence that brain fog is a transdiagnostic entity with a common phenomenology and profile of objective cognitive deficits. We discuss where these commonalities arise and argue that linguistic ambiguity, shared cognitive impairments, and noncognitive factors are more likely than shared neurobiology. We suggest how future research might apply existing tools to disambiguate the phenomena that brain fog conflates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denno et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: