Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The intricacies of relationships between e-commerce platforms and manufacturers have deepened with the e-commerce economy's rapid evolution, highlighting the significance of fairness concerns from the perspective of decision-makers within these entities. We delve into how these concerns influence the strategic equilibrium of both stakeholders, focusing on two distinct fairness concern drivers: brand differences and channel competition. Through a game-theoretic lens, our analysis reveals that general fairness concerns tend to diminish profitability for both e-platforms and manufacturers, necessitating a delicate balance between fairness and profit maximization. The source of fairness concerns plays a pivotal role in shaping pricing strategies and profitability outcomes. However, there exist situations where one party's fairness concerns could raise the profits for the other party, adding a layer of complexity to these dynamics. Additionally, the strategies surrounding product offerings by manufacturers are intricately linked to the service levels provided by e-commerce platforms, suggesting a strategic interplay that warrants careful consideration by platform operators to sustain equitable supply chain partnerships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: