Key result
Odor stimulation drives ~2-fold increase in mitral/tufted cells exhibiting membrane potential slow oscillations.
Why the study?
A slow respiration-related rhythm strongly shapes olfactory bulb activity, prompting investigation into the rules governing membrane potential slow oscillations and respiration-related discharge activities under various afferent input conditions and cellular excitability states.
Both intracellular excitability state and input strength underlie specific membrane potential slow oscillations, which constrain spike patterns in mitral/tufted cells.
May shape mitral/tufted cell dynamics in olfaction; leaves open translation beyond anesthetized rodents.
Background A slow respiration-related rhythm strongly shapes the activity of the olfactory bulb. This rhythm appears as a slow oscillation that is detectable in the membrane potential, the respiration-related spike discharge of the mitral/tufted cells and the bulbar local field potential. Here, we investigated the rules that govern the manifestation of membrane potential slow oscillations (MPSOs) and respiration-related discharge activities under various afferent input conditions and cellular excitability states. Methodology and principal findings We recorded the intracellular membrane potential signals in the mitral/tufted cells of freely breathing anesthetized rats. We first demonstrated the existence of multiple types of MPSOs, which were influenced by odor stimulation and discharge activity patterns. Complementary studies using changes in the intracellular excitability state and a computational model of the mitral cell demonstrated that slow oscillations in the mitral/tufted cell membrane potential were also modulated by the intracellular excitability state, whereas the respiration-related spike activity primarily reflected the afferent input. Based on our data regarding MPSOs and spike patterns, we found that cells exhibiting an unsynchronized discharge pattern never exhibited an MPSO. In contrast, cells with a respiration-synchronized discharge pattern always exhibited an MPSO. In addition, we demonstrated that the association between spike patterns and MPSO types appeared complex. Conclusion We propose that both the intracellular excitability state and input strength underlie specific MPSOs, which, in turn, constrain the types of spike patterns exhibited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Briffaud et al. (2012) studied Olfactory bulb mitral/tufted cell electrophysiological activity (n=48). Odor stimulation and intracellular current injection vs. Control period (resting state without odor stimulation) was evaluated on Proportion of mitral/tufted cells exhibiting membrane potential slow oscillations (MPSOs) (p=<0.005). Odor stimulation significantly increased the proportion of mitral/tufted cells exhibiting membrane potential slow oscillations from 33.3% to 66.7% (p<0.005) in anesthetized rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: