No AccessJournal of UrologyClinical Urology: This Month in Investigative Urology1 Jul 1995Commentary on ESWL and Blood Pressure James E. Lingeman, John R. Woods, and David R. Nelson James E. LingemanJames E. Lingeman , John R. WoodsJohn R. Woods , and David R. NelsonDavid R. Nelson View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67206-9AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 Newmark, J. R. and Lingeman, J. E.: Complications. In: Smith's Textbook of Endourology. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, in press. Google Scholar 2 Evan, A. P., Willis, L. R., Connors, B., Reed, G., McAteer, J. A. and Lingeman, J. E.: Shock wave lithotripsy-induced renal injury. Am. Google Scholar 3 : Biological effects of shock waves: kidney damage by shock waves in dogs--dose dependence. Ultrasound Med. Biol.1988; 14: 117. Google Scholar 4 : Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and other forms of treatment for nephrolithiasis. J.A.M.A.1990; 263: 1789. Google Scholar 5 : Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis. J. Urol.1992; 147: 553. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Blood pressure changes after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in normotensive patients. J. Urol.1993; 150: 1765. Google Scholar 7 Five-year findings of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. J.A.M.A.1979; 242: 2572. Google Scholar 8 : Hypertension following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Urol.1987; 137: 142A. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Five-year followup of urinary stone patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Endourol.1988; 2: 157. Google Scholar 10 : Hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a false alarm. J. Endourol.1989; 3: 401. Google Scholar 11 : Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: long-term complications. Am. J. Roentgenol.1988; 150: 311. Google Scholar 12 : Does extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy cause hypertension? Br. J. Urol.1989; 64: 567. Google Scholar 13 : Hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: incidence following treatment with Dornier HM3 lithotripter or Wolf Piezolith 2300 lithotripter. In: Shock Wave Lithotripsy II: Urinary and Biliary Lithotripsy. Edited by . New York: Plenum Press1989: 223. Google Scholar 14 : Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in old persons with isolated systolic hypertension. J.A.M.A.1991; 265: 3255. Google Scholar 15 : Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy induced perirenal hematomas. J. Urol.1988; 139: 700. Link, Google Scholar 16 : Renal function following extracorporeal lithotripsy in children. J. Pediatr. Surg.1991; 26: 539. Google Scholar 17 : Simultaneous bilateral extracorporeal shock wave treatments of the kidney in a primate model. J. Endourol.1991; 5: 41. Google Scholar 18 : The effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on renal growth, function and arterial blood pressure in an animal model. J. Urol.1991; 146: 544. Link, Google Scholar 19 : The progression of renal disease: structural and functional correlations. In: Renal Pathology. Edited by . Philadelphia: Lippincott1994: 116. Google Scholar 20 : Renal injury by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Endourol.1991; 5: 25. Google Scholar 21 : Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: New Aspects in the Treatment of Kidney Stone Disease. Basel: S. Karger1982. Google Scholar 22 : The role of lithotripsy and its side effects. J. Urol.1989; 141: 793. Link, Google Scholar Research Institute for Kidney Stone Disease (J. E. Lingeman).Center for Health Services Research, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana (J. R. Woods, D. R. Nelson)© 1995FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 154Issue 1July 1995Page: 2-4 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1995MetricsAuthor Information James E. Lingeman More articles by this author John R. Woods More articles by this author David R. Nelson More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lingeman et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: