Describes the process and outputs of the findings to date in a research project to determine quality in academic business journal publishing, sponsored by a major academic publishing house. Describes the refereeing/review process for journal articles, a study of quality indicators in established “academic” journals, and the same in “practitioner” journals. Draws conclusions for quality improvement in the journals surveyed based on the findings. Draws conclusions for other researchers and publishers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Day et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: