Why the study?
Does ECG-gated metabolic PET accurately predict perfusion-metabolism mismatch in patients with impaired left ventricular contraction?
Does ECG-gated metabolic PET accurately predict perfusion-metabolism mismatch in patients with impaired left ventricular contraction?
ECG-gated FDG-PET alone may serve as an accurate surrogate for dual perfusion-metabolism PET imaging in identifying hibernating myocardium.
Gated FDG-PET may simplify viability assessment; leaves open accuracy versus dual-tracer PET before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Perfusion-metabolism mismatch pattern on positron emission tomography (PET) predicts hibernating myocardium. We assess the ECG-gated metabolic PET as a surrogate for the perfusion-metabolism mismatch pattern on PET imaging. METHODS: F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) are respectively perfusion and metabolism PET tracers. We used ECG gating to acquire FDG-PET to collect wall thickening (mechanical) data. These allow detection of metabolic activity in regions with reduced contraction (metabolism-mechanical mismatch pattern). We had two data sets on each patient: perfusion-metabolism and metabolism-mechanical data sets. We tested the hypothesis that metabolism-mechanical pattern on PET could predict perfusion-metabolism mismatch pattern. RESULTS: We studied 55 patients (48 males), mean age 62 years. All were in sinus rhythm, and had impaired left ventricular contraction. Perfusion-metabolism mismatch pattern was found in 26 patients. Metabolism-mechanical mismatch pattern was found in 25 patients. The results were concordant in 52 patients (95%). As a surrogate for perfusion-metabolism mismatch pattern, demonstration of metabolism-mechanical mismatch pattern is highly sensitive (92%) and specific (97%). In this cohort, the positive and negative predictive accuracy of the new method are 96% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Metabolism-mechanical mismatch pattern could predict perfusion-metabolism mismatch pattern in patients with myocardial viability criteria on PET. Prospective validation against the gold standard of improved myocardial contraction after revascularisation is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Mohammad et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: