Chronic stimulation of AT1R directly leads to delayed repolarization and increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in a mouse model, independent of cardiac remodeling.
May inform AT1R-related arrhythmia mechanisms; leaves open translation to human risk.
AIMS: Mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of human angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) undergo cardiac remodelling and die prematurely of sudden death. Since excessive QT prolongation is a major risk factor for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death, we hypothesize that chronic stimulation of AT1R might contribute to sudden death by promoting delayed repolarization and ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: In the present study, a detailed analysis of ventricular repolarization parameters was undertaken in AT1R mice. RESULTS: Measurement of K+ currents in ventricular myocytes isolated from 6-8 months AT1R male mice revealed a significant reduction of the Ca2+-independent transient outward (I(to)), the ultra-rapid delayed rectifier (I Kur)), and the inward rectifier (I K1) K+ currents compared with littermate controls (CTL). The expression of the underlying K+ channels was also decreased in AT1R ventricles. Moreover, reactivation of I(to) was slower in AT1R mice. Consistent with these findings, AT1R mice presented a longer action potential duration (APD90, CTL: 19.0 +/- 1.8 ms; AT1R: 39.1 +/- 4.7 ms, P = 0.0001) and QTc interval (CTL: 53.6 +/- 1.5 ms, AT1R: 64.2 +/- 1.4 ms, P = 0.0005). In addition, spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias were reported in the AT1R mice. Importantly, the increased incidence of arrhythmia and the repolarization defects also occurred in much younger AT1R mice that do not present signs of hypertrophy, confirming that these arrhythmogenic changes are not secondary to cardiac remodelling. CONCLUSION: These results strongly suggest that chronic stimulation of AT1R directly leads to an increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmia associated with delayed repolarization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivard et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: