Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wave-equation inversion is a powerful technique able to build higher-resolution images with balanced amplitudes in complex subsurface areas relative to migration alone. Wave-equation inversion can be performed in image space without making velocity-model or acquisition-geometry approximations. Our method explicitly computes the least-squares Hessian matrix, defined from the modeling/migration operators, and uses a linear solver to find the solution of the resulting system of equations. One important advantage of the explicit computation of the Hessian, compared to iterative modeling/migration operations schemes, is that most of the work (precomputing the Hessian) is done up front; afterward, different inversion parameters or schemes can be tried at lower cost. Another advantage is that the method canhandle 3D data in a target-oriented fashion. The inversion in the presence of a complex overburden leads to an ill-conditioned system of equations that must be regularized to obtain a stable numerical solution. Regularization can be implemented in the poststack-image domain (zero subsurface offset), where the options for a regularization operator are limited to a customary damping, or in the prestack-image domain (subsurface offset), where a physically inspired regularization operator (differential semblance) can be applied. Though the prestack-image-domain inversion is more expensive than the poststack-image-domain inversion, it can improve the reflectors' continuity into the shadow zones with an enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. Improved subsalt-sediment images in the Sigsbee2b synthetic model and a 3D Gulf of Mexico field data set confirm the benefits of the inversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valenciano et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: