Why the study?
The most effective way and source to communicate risk information and lifestyle advice in cardiac rehabilitation were not yet known.
Does the source (cardiologist vs physiotherapist) and framing (gain vs loss) of brief lifestyle advice improve intention-to-change-lifestyle in cardiovascular disease patients?
Does the source (cardiologist vs physiotherapist) and framing (gain vs loss) of brief lifestyle advice improve intention-to-change-lifestyle in cardiovascular disease patients?
Brief lifestyle advice delivered by cardiologists elicits higher patient intention to change lifestyle than when delivered by physiotherapists, and emphasizing benefits (gain-framing) significantly improves patient recall compared to emphasizing risks.
Cardiologist source may modestly raise intention vs physiotherapist; leaves open whether framing or delivery affects actual behavior change.
OBJECTIVE: Communicating risk information and offering lifestyle advice are important goals in cardiac rehabilitation. However, the most effective way and the most effective source to communicate this information are not yet known. Therefore, we examined the effect of source (cardiologist, physiotherapist) and framing (gain, loss) of brief lifestyle advice on patients' intention-to-change-lifestyle. METHODS: In an online experimental study, 636 cardiac patients (40% female, 67 (10) yrs.) were randomly assigned to one of four textual vignettes. Effect of source and framing on intention-to-change-lifestyle (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale) was analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS: Patients expressed positive intention-to-change-lifestyle after receiving advice from the cardiologist (M = 4.1) and physiotherapist (M = 3.9). However, patients showed significantly higher intention-to-change-lifestyle after receiving advice from the cardiologist (0.58 [0.54-0.61]) when compared with the physiotherapist (0.52 [0.48-0.56]), (F[1,609] = 7.06, P = 0.01). Gain-framed and loss-framed advice appeared equally effective. However, communicating risks (loss) was remembered by only 9% of patients, whereas 89% remembered benefits (gain). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the value of cardiologists and physiotherapists communicating brief lifestyle advice, as cardiac patients expressed positive intention for lifestyle change after receiving advice, irrespective of framing. Lifestyle advice should include benefits due to better recall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
IJzerman et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: