Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe patients with coronary artery disease eligible for secondary prevention and assess their healthcare consumption and costs from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.
Patients with CAD eligible for secondary prevention in Italy have a high burden of comorbidities, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary management.
Documents high INHS costs and resource use in CAD secondary prevention; leaves open whether targeted interventions could reduce burden.
BACKGROUND: This study describes patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who are eligible for secondary prevention and assesses their healthcare consumption and costs from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (INHS). METHODS: From the Fondazione Ricerca e Salute's database, which collects Italian healthcare administrative data, all patients aged ≥ 35, with ≥1 primary in-hospital CAD diagnosis and/or procedure on the coronary arteries, or with the specific disease exemption code, and who are suitable for long-term secondary prevention treatments, were identified in 2018 and analyzed. Demographics, comorbidities, one-year supplied drugs, hospitalizations, and costs were analyzed. RESULTS: From >3 million inhabitants aged ≥ 35, 46,063 (1.3%) were identified (72.1% males, mean age 70 ± 12; approximately 50% with ≥3 comorbidities). During a one-year follow-up, 96.4% were treated with ≥1 drug for secondary prevention (mainly antiplatelets and lipid lowering agents), 69.4% with ≥1 concomitant cardiovascular drug, and 95.8% with ≥1 concomitant non-cardiovascular therapy. Within one year, 30.6% of patients were hospitalized at least once, mostly due to non-cardiovascular events. Calculated by mean, the INHS paid EUR 6078 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the relevant burden of CAD for patients with many comorbidities and who are frequently hospitalized, and the burden on the INHS. A multidisciplinary healthcare approach is encouraged to improve patients' outcomes and reduce costs for the INHS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calabria et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: