Objective: The purpose of this study is to define the main forms and methods used for implementation of mobilization measures under the legal regime of martial law in Ukraine. Theoretical Framework: The study is based on the principles of administrative law and also complies with the regulatory framework of Ukrainian legislation. The basis for the study was the following legislative acts: For the study, a number of the normative legal acts were used, including the Constitution of Ukraine (1996), the Criminal Code of Ukraine (2001), the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (1984), the Law of Ukraine On Mobilization Training and Mobilization (1993). Method: the article used methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization and comparison. Sources include current legislation, international conventions, and relevant academic research. Results and Discussion: The study results show that the fundamental form of mobilization measures conducting is legislative activity. In order to implement the legal provisions, there is a system of state bodies that ensure the implementation of mobilization measures. Specifically, the territorial recruitment and social support centers conduct document verification measures, make decisions on mobilization and deferment of persons liable for military service, also decide on the liability of persons who violate the rules of mobilization. Moreover, the study identifies the leading methods used for implementation of mobilization measures, which are persuasion and coercion. Research Implications: The article proposes to improve the mobilization mechanism taking into account the challenges of war. The state is trying to implement new approaches and methods of carrying out mobilization measures in order to adapt to new realities. However, it is evident that all innovations in the mobilization processes require detailed study and generalization. Originality/Value: The study contributes to theoretical research on the mobilization process under martial law. The study reveals the main forms and methods by which conscription is carried out, reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the use of conscription support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anatolii Oleksandrovych Yatsyshyn (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: