Research background: Risk-taking has long been considered fundamental to sustainable firm growth and performance. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) is crucial to aligning risk-taking decisions with sustainable development goals and enhancing long-term value and stakeholder trust; however, ESG commitments can potentially become a financial burden. Purpose of the article: This study examines the impact of ESG practices on corporate risk-taking (CRT), examining the underlying mechanisms and the U-shaped relationship that suggests the potential drawbacks of excessive ESG commitments. Methods: Using a panel fixed-effect model for Chinese publicly listed firms disclosing ESG data from 2010 to 2023, this study empirically examines the curvilinear relationship between ESG and CRT, validated by the three-step U-test, instrumental variables analysis, and propensity score matching. A panel mediation effect model and moderating effect model for the U-shaped channels are also applied. Findings & value-added: The findings confirm a robust U-shaped curve across multiple sensitivity tests. On disaggregating the ESG components, environmental and social exhibit similar U-shaped curves, whereas governance has an inverted U-shaped relationship with CRT. The mechanism tests reveal the corporate innovation level is a crucial transmission channel for the U-shaped effect, and institutional ownership acts as a moderator influencing CRT through ESG. The heterogeneity analysis further demonstrates the U-shaped effect of ESG performance on CRT is more consequential in non-environmentally sensitive industries and non-state-owned enterprises. These findings demonstrate ESG practices, while motivated by ethical intention, can have a double-edged effect. The research provides novel insights and practical recommendations for policymakers, managers, and stakeholders, aiding in the development of effective ESG policies and strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: