Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis and biological test results of a series of enkephalin analogues incorporating the lanthionine modification are presented. The syntheses of four monosulfide-bridged analogues of enkephalins, Tyr-c[D-Ala(L)-Gly-Phe-D-Ala(L)]-OH (1a), Tyr-c[D-Val(L)-Gly-Phe-D-Ala(L)]-OH (1b), Tyr-c[D-Ala(L)-Gly-Phe-Ala(L)]-OH (1c), and Tyr-c[D-Val(L)-Gly-Phe-Ala(L)]-OH (1d), where Ala(L) and Val(L) denote the lanthionine amino acid ends linked by a monosulfide bridge to form the lanthionine structure, were successfully carried out via preparation of the linear peptide on solid support and cyclization in solution. In vitro binding assays against mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors and in vitro tests using GPI and MVD assays revealed that the dimethyl lanthionine analogues 1b and 1d, denoted as D-Val(L) in position 2, show substantial selectivity toward the delta-opioid receptor, while the unsubstituted analogues 1a and 1c, denoted as D-Ala(L) in position 2, bind to both mu- and delta-opioid receptors. The in vivo thermal escape assay by intrathecal administration showed that the analogues 1b and 1d are among the most potent ligands at producing antinociception through the delta-opioid receptor. The picomolar potencies of analogues 1a and 1c in the intrathecal (it.) assay strongly indicate that mu- and delta-opioid receptors interact synergistically to modulate the antinociceptive responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rew et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: