Why the study?
Does tailoring aspirin regimens (e.g., twice-daily low dose) improve platelet inhibition compared to standard once-daily dosing in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does tailoring aspirin regimens (e.g., twice-daily low dose) improve platelet inhibition compared to standard once-daily dosing in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Intra- and inter-individual variability in aspirin response suggests that tailored regimens, such as twice-daily low-dose aspirin, may provide better platelet inhibition than standard once-daily dosing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Twice-daily low-dose aspirin may improve platelet inhibition surrogates; leaves open whether regimens should change in cardiovascular disease.
Once-daily, low-dose aspirin is a cornerstone in the prophylaxis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Aspirin 'resistance' still lacks definition, a standardized reference assay, underlying mechanisms, clinical impact or efficacy of alternative antiplatelet drugs. Aspirin response in several studies has been measured by different platelet function tests, not always reflecting aspirin pharmacodynamics, thus generating significantly heterogeneous results. The EMA indicated serum thromboxane B2 as the only valid surrogate assay to study different aspirin formulations. Rather than resistance, recent studies focused on sources of intra- and inter-individual variability in response to aspirin, based on pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Drug interactions, diabetes, conditions of increased platelet output, obesity and aging can potentially increase the variability of aspirin response. Preliminary studies testing different aspirin regimens showed that twice-daily low doses were more effective than once-daily higher aspirin doses on surrogate end points of platelet inhibition. Large studies are needed to test new disease-tailored, low-dose aspirin regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocca et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: