Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital Sentencing: Are Emotional Jurors Really Irrational?

Research Article| October 01 2006 Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital Sentencing: Are Emotional Jurors Really Irrational? Bryan Myers, Bryan Myers Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Emalee Weidemann, Emalee Weidemann Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Gregory Pearce Gregory Pearce Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Federal Sentencing Reporter (2006) 19 (1): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2006.19.1.13 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Bryan Myers, Emalee Weidemann, Gregory Pearce; Psychology Weighs in on the Debate Surrounding Victim Impact Statements and Capital Sentencing: Are Emotional Jurors Really Irrational?. Federal Sentencing Reporter 1 October 2006; 19 (1): 13–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2006.19.1.13 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentFederal Sentencing Reporter Search This content is only available via PDF.