Why the study?
Does a slower resting heart rate improve the hemodynamic response to exercise in a computational model of permanent atrial fibrillation compared to a higher resting heart rate?
Does a slower resting heart rate improve the hemodynamic response to exercise in a computational model of permanent atrial fibrillation compared to a higher resting heart rate?
Computational modeling suggests that a slower resting heart rate (70 bpm) in permanent AF provides a more favorable hemodynamic profile during exercise compared to a higher resting heart rate (100 bpm).
Model suggests slower resting HR improves exercise hemodynamics in permanent AF; hypothesis-generating and requires clinical validation.
AIMS: Clinical data indicating a heart rate (HR) target during rate control therapy for permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and assessing its eventual relationship with reduced exercise tolerance are lacking. The present study aims at investigating the impact of resting HR on the hemodynamic response to exercise in permanent AF patients by means of a computational cardiovascular model. METHODS: The AF lumped-parameter model was run to simulate resting (1 Metabolic Equivalent of Task-MET) and various exercise conditions (4 METs: brisk walking; 6 METs: skiing; 8 METs: running), considering different resting HR (70 bpm for the slower resting HR-SHR-simulations, and 100 bpm for the higher resting HR-HHR-simulations). To compare relative variations of cardiovascular variables upon exertion, the variation comparative index (VCI)-the absolute variation between the exercise and the resting values in SHR simulations referred to the absolute variation in HHR simulations-was calculated at each exercise grade (VCI4, VCI6 and VCI8). RESULTS: Pulmonary venous pressure underwent a greater increase in HHR compared to SHR simulations (VCI4 = 0.71, VCI6 = 0.73 and VCI8 = 0.77), while for systemic arterial pressure the opposite is true (VCI4 = 1.15, VCI6 = 1.36, VCI8 = 1.56). CONCLUSIONS: The computational findings suggest that a slower, with respect to a higher resting HR, might be preferable in permanent AF patients, since during exercise pulmonary venous pressure undergoes a slighter increase and systemic blood pressure reveals a more appropriate increase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anselmino et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: