Authors
Assessment of indirect emission factors (EF 5r ) of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) from agricultural river networks remains challenging, and results are uncertain due to limited data availability. This study compared two methods of assessing EF 5r using data from long-term observations at high temporal resolution in a typical agricultural catchment in subtropical central China. The concentration method (method 1) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2006 method (method 2) were employed to evaluate the emission factor. EF 5r estimated using method 1 (i.e., EF 5r1 ) was 0.00077 ± 0.00025 (0.00038–0.00097). EF 5r calculated using method 2 (i.e., EF 5r2 ) was lower than EF 5r1, with a mean value of 0.00004 (0.000015–0.00012). Both EF 5r1 and EF 5r2 were significantly lower than the IPCC 2006 default value of 0.0025, suggesting that N 2 O emissions from China and world river networks may be grossly overestimated. A complex N 2 O production pathway and diffusion mechanism were responsible for the transfer of N 2 O from the sediment to river water and then to the atmosphere. These findings provide essential data for refining national greenhouse gas inventories and contribute evidence for downward revision of indirect emission factors adopted by the IPCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: