In a study that investigated the predictive validity of a self-directed learning readiness scale (SDLRS), scores received by 63 first year nursing students on this scale were compared to alternate measures of self-directedness. These measures included nominations as self-directed learners by peers and faculty; entry grades from high school; and grades received at the end of the first year nursing program in five subjects. Results showed a significant correlation between SDLRS scores and peer nomination scores and between SDLRS scores and first year final subject grades. While these correlations were statistically significant, they explained only 7% and 8% of the variance thus not reaching an educationally meaningful level. Limitations of the alternate measures as a substitution for a "gold standard" are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joan Crook (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: