Why the study?
Does ticagrelor monotherapy improve outcomes compared to aspirin monotherapy in patients following lower extremity endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease?
Does ticagrelor monotherapy improve outcomes compared to aspirin monotherapy in patients following lower extremity endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease?
The TI-PAD trial highlights significant challenges in recruiting PAD patients for monotherapy antiplatelet trials post-endovascular revascularization, emphasizing the need for pragmatic trial designs.
TI-PAD underrecruitment leaves ticagrelor versus aspirin efficacy open after PAD revascularization; larger trials required before practice change.
There is limited evidence to guide clinical decision-making for antiplatelet therapy in peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the setting of lower extremity endovascular treatment. The Ticagrelor in Peripheral Artery Disease Endovascular Revascularization Study (TI-PAD) evaluated the role of ticagrelor versus aspirin as monotherapy in the management of patients following lower extremity endovascular revascularization. The trial failed to recruit the targeted number of patients, likely due to aspects of the design including the lack of option for dual antiplatelet therapy, and inability to identify suitable patients at study sites. In response, the protocol underwent amendments, but these changes did not adequately stimulate recruitment, and thus TI-PAD was prematurely terminated. This article describes the rationale for TI-PAD and challenges in trial design, subject recruitment and trial operations to better inform the conduct of future trials in PAD revascularization. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02227368.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogers et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: