Purpose Through interactional, multilevel models of social determinants of health (SDoH) incorporating comprehensive census-level and individual-level SDoH-factors, to assess whether pituitary adenoma disparities are more strongly associated with community-level factors compared to individual-level ones. Methods This retrospective study analyzed pituitary adenoma patients nationally between 2010 and 2018 using multivariate, age-adjusted regressions and cox-proportional hazards models; covariates of sex, race-ethnicity, census-level rurality-urbanicity, census-level Yost-Index score (aggregating 7 SES-measures of education, income, housing) and clinical outcomes of mortality, surgical resection, & delays-in-treatment (3 months-or-over from diagnosis). Results Across 44,514 pituitary adenomas-patients, all-cause mortality featured markedly positive independent predictors of decreasing Yost-SES (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35–1.52; p < 0.001) and Male-Sex (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16–1.32; p < 0.001). Indicated surgery receipt showed markedly positive independent predictors of Male-Sex (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.59–1.72; p < 0.001), Minority Race/Ethnicity (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.14–1.23; p < 0.001), and Rurality (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01–1.16; p = 0.030). Having a delay-of-treatment showed markedly positive independent predictors of Female-Sex (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.18–1.30; p < 0.001) and decreasing Yost-SES (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08–1.20; p < 0.001). Conclusions Through assessing individual- and community-level social determinants in tandem, this study identified detrimental SDoH-associations with pituitary adenoma care and prognosis. Community-level Yost-Index SES and individual sex showed stronger associations with observed disparities, presenting multilevel considerations for prospective initiatives to consider.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: