Why the study?
Does a 30-minute lecture improve knowledge retention regarding out-of-hospital aspirin use for AMI among paramedics?
Does a 30-minute lecture improve knowledge retention regarding out-of-hospital aspirin use for AMI among paramedics?
A brief didactic session significantly improved paramedics' retention of knowledge regarding out-of-hospital aspirin use for AMI at 3 months.
Brief education may improve paramedic knowledge retention on prehospital aspirin for AMI; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Paramedics (EMT-Ps) often care for patients having an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The benefit of early administration of aspirin in AMI is well established. This study was undertaken to determine whether EMT-Ps are able to retain information regarding the use of aspirin in AMI after a standard didactic session. METHODS: The EMT-Ps from a suburban EMS system with an annual call volume of 4,000 were given a 12-question test regarding the out-of-hospital use of aspirin in AMI. They then received a 30-minute lecture about the use of aspirin in the out-of-hospital venue. Aspirin was then put into the treatment protocols for AMI. Three months after the educational session, a follow-up test was administered. A paired, two-tailed t-test was used to compare pretest and posttest scores with a p < or = 0.05 for statistical significance. RESULTS: The study was completed by 22 of 25 EMT-Ps. The scores on the pretest ranged from 50% to 100% correct, with an average score of 83%. The posttest scores ranged from 83% to 100%, with an average score of 94% (p = 0.002). The questions missed on the posttest were regarding: 1) the length of the effects of aspirin, 2) the bronchospastic effects of aspirin, and 3) the recently instituted indications for its out-of-hospital use. All paramedics correctly identified the contraindications to aspirin use. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that EMT-Ps can retain information regarding the out-of-hospital use of aspirin for AMI after a standard didactic session. Further study is needed to determine how this information is clinically applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Funk et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: