Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This commentary unpicks ethos and assemblage, and specifically explores the way assemblage becomes a kind of ethos in itself. By unravelling the use and maybe neglect of ethos within Anderson et al.’s (2012) paper and wider geographies – despite its animating force within them – the paper encourages more explicit concern for how we think, do, or live ethos within research and writing, and the promise of assemblage as ethos/ethos as assemblage, for broader geographical work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Adey (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: