Battery digital twins (BDT) require models that are both accurate and interpretable to ensure reliable monitoring and control in practical applications. Genetic programming (GP) provides human-interpretable models. However, fitness principles (FPs) often suffer from overfitting and weak generalization under the nonlinear behavior and dynamic operating conditions of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries. Structural Risk Minimization (SRM) partially addresses these issues, but it remains limited by its single-objective nature. To address this limitation, a novel FP, Multi-Objective Structural Risk Minimization (MOSRM) has been proposed. The proposed FP introduces an adaptive trade-off between predictive error and model complexity, which guides algorithm to select robust and interpretable symbolic equations. The framework is validated on dynamic stress test (DST) profiles for state-of-charge (SoC), state-of-energy (SoE), state-of-power (SoP) estimation as well as a theoretical battery degradation model. Results show that MOSRM improves predictive accuracy by more than 60% on unscaled data, reduces estimation error by approximately 30%, and decreases model complexity by over 75% compared to existing FPs. These findings establish MOSRM as a significant advancement in symbolic modeling for BDTs, with potential extension to diverse chemistries, real-time degradation, and varied operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vandana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: