For decades, geomagnetic indices have been used extensively to parameterize space weather events, as input to various models and as space weather specifications. The auroral electrojet ( A E ) index and disturbance storm time index ( D S T ) are two such indices that span multiple solar cycles and have been widely studied. The production of improved spatial coverage analogs to A E and D S T is now possible using the SuperMAG collaboration of ground‐based magnetometers. S M E is an electrojet index that shares methodology with A E . S M R is a ring current index that shares methodology with D S T . As the number of magnetometer stations in the SuperMAG network increases over time, so does the spatial resolution of S M E and S M R . Our statistical comparison between the established indices and their new SuperMAG counterparts finds that, for large excursions in geomagnetic activity, A E systematically underestimates S M E for later cycles. The difference between distributions of recorded A E and S M E values for a single solar maximum can be of the same order as changes in activity seen from one solar cycle to the next. We demonstrate that D S T and S M R track each other but are subject to an approximate linear shift as a result of the procedure used to map stations to the magnetic equator. We explain the observed differences between A E and S M E with the assistance of a simple model, based on the construction methodology of the electrojet indices. We show that in the case of A E and S M E , it is not possible to simply translate between the two indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: