Why the study?
Patients with heart failure struggle with self-care management because daily monitoring and symptom recognition do not readily prompt action to avoid hospital admissions.
Does a nurse-led intervention on symptom recognition and fluid restriction improve self-care management and quality of life in patients with heart failure?
Does a nurse-led intervention on symptom recognition and fluid restriction improve self-care management and quality of life in patients with heart failure?
A nurse-led program focusing on symptom recognition and fluid restriction significantly improves self-care behaviors and quality of life while reducing hospitalizations in heart failure patients.
May support nurse-led HF self-care programs; pilot RCT leaves open efficacy in larger trials.
Patients with heart failure have difficulty in self-care management, as daily monitoring and recognizing symptoms do not readily triggers an action to avoid hospital admissions. The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of a nurse-led complex intervention on symptom recognition and fluid restriction. A latent growth model was designed to estimate self-care management and quality of life changes on patients with heart failure and assessed by a pilot study, for three months, to sixty-three patients (33 control, 30 intervention). Patients in the control group had a higher risk of hospitalisation (IRR 11.36; p<.001) and emergency admission (IRR 4.24; p<.001) at three-months follow-up. Analysis of the time scores demonstrated that the intervention group had a clear improvement in self-care behaviours (βSlope. Assignment_group=-.881; p<.001) and in the quality of life (βSlope. Assignment_group=1.739; p<.001). This study supports that a nurse-led program on symptom recognition and fluid restriction can have a positive impact on self-care behaviours and quality of life in patients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sousa et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: