Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present measurements of O− electron stimulated desorption yields obtained under identical experimental conditions from 0.15 monolayers (ML) of O2 deposited onto disordered substrates consisting of 4 ML of either Kr, Xe, C2H6, C2H4, N2O, CH3Cl, or H2O, all condensed on Pt (polycrystalline). The resulting O− yield functions, for incident electron energies below 20 eV, are compared to that obtained from the O2/Kr solid; this allows us to assess the order of magnitude effects of the local substrate environment on dissociative electron attachment (DEA) via the 2Πu and gas phase forbidden 2Σ+g,u resonances of O−2. We note that, in addition to electron energy losses in the substrate prior to DEA to O2 and post-dissociation interactions of the O− with the substrate molecules, charge or energy transfer from the O−2 transient anion to a substrate molecule, and capture of the incident electron into a dissociative anion resonance of the substrate molecule may contribute to a reduced O− yield from the physisorbed O2. In the case of O2 deposited on amorphous ice, we find that the O− signal from DEA to O2 is completely absent for electron energies below 14 eV; we attribute this to a complete quenching of the dissociative O−2(2Πu, 2Σ+) resonances by the adjacent water molecules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huels et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: