Soot samples from a spark generator, a flame, and a diesel passenger car were either collected on a Teflon filter and transferred to an IR-transparent window or deposited directly from a flame onto the window and investigated by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The soot-covered windows were mounted in a 10 cm vacuum cell connected to a standard flow system with He as carrier gas. Reactive gases, such as NO 2 and HNO 3, were added to the carrier gas flow at a concentration of (0.016 to 2.5) × 10 14 molecule cm -3 . FTIR spectra of soot samples before and after exposure to HNO 3, NO 2, and O 3 are presented. Formation of IR absorption bands was analyzed as a function of exposure time. IR bands attributable to soot surface oxidation products and nitrogen containing species, e.g. −C O, R−NO 2, R−ONO 2, and R−ONO were observed. The observed time dependence of the absorption bands of the spark generator soot can be fitted by two parallel reactions, a slow and a fast process. Both processes have a reaction order of n ≈ 0.2 (±0.3) for the NO 2 + soot reaction and n ≈ 0.5 (±0.6) for the HNO 3 + soot reaction. The number of active sites, N max = 2.2 × 10 14 molecules cm -2 soot surface, has been estimated from saturation experiments. Surface reaction probabilities depend on reactant concentration and reaction time and were in the range of γ ≈ 10 -6 to 10 -8 for the slow, and γ ≈ 10 -3 to 10 -6 for the fast processes. The reaction probability on diesel engine soot was nearly 1 order of magnitude slower. It is concluded that the reaction of NO 2 with soot cannot account for the HONO levels observed in urban air.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirchner et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: