Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the information postsecondary institutions require when determining disability service eligibility for students with reported ADHD. METHOD: ADHD documentation requirements of 200 U.S. institutions were surveyed by reviewing guidelines posted on disability services websites. RESULTS: Whereas virtually all institutions required documentation, findings revealed significant variability in requirements across institutions. Required variables most often included a qualified evaluator (80%), diagnostic statement (75%), and identification of substantial limitations (73%), but only 5 of 46 evaluated variables were required by at least 50% of institutions. Supportive data such as diagnostic criteria, standardized assessment results, and rationale for accommodations were rarely required. CONCLUSION: The majority of institutions required little to verify ADHD as a disability. Furthermore, there was little agreement on what components are essential for verification. When integrated with research, a large portion of guidelines failed to address identified weaknesses in ADHD diagnosis and disability determination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindstrom et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: