The claim by Retallack (2010) that the ancient Mistaken Point trace fossil assemblage (Liu et al., 2010) might turn out to be a species of tool mark known only from shallow water, while interesting, is redundant because all our evidence points to a depositional environment that was unequivocally deep marine. Earlier publications did indeed favor a shallow marine interpretation (Misra, 1971). However, all subsequent sedimentologically focused studies of the Mistaken Point Formation have inferred deep-water turbidite or contourite depositional mechanisms (e.g., Narbonne et al., 2001; Wood et al., 2003; Ichaso et al., 2007), conclusions with which we firmly concur.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Geology