This study explored students’ perceptions of multiple combinations of mastery-oriented and performance-oriented classroom goal structure (CGS) profiles based on specific instructional dimensions (i.e., task, autonomy/time, group, and recognition/evaluation) in reading classes and examined the associations between these profiles and trichotomous achievement goals, self-efficacy, and reading performance. The participants included 843 eighth-grade students from Beijing, mainland China. Questionnaires were used to collect students’ perceptions of instructional dimensions, achievement goals, and self-efficacy, whereas reading performance was derived from standardized test scores obtained two months prior to the administration of the questionnaire. Latent profile analysis revealed three distinct profiles: Profile 1, “Performance-evaluation & group-dominant CGS” (12%); Profile 2, “Balanced-moderate CGS” (34%); and Profile 3, “Mastery-dominant CGS” (54%). The results obtained via the Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars approach revealed that the students in Profile 3 obtained significantly higher values in terms of individual achievement goals, self-efficacy, and reading performance than the students in the other two profiles did. Mediation analyses further revealed that compared with the students in Profile 1, students in Profiles 2 and 3 exhibited higher self-efficacy and reading performance through the indirect associations through mastery goals. This quantitative study provides empirical support for mastery-oriented instruction and demonstrates the adaptive role of mastery goals in the East Asian reading domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: