In this paper I propose and estimate an equilibrium search model using matched employer-employee data to study the extent to which wage dierentials between men and women can be explained by differences in productivity, disparities in friction patterns, segregation or wage discrimination. The availability of matched employer-employee data is essential to empirically disentangle dierences in workers productivity across groups from dierences in wage policies toward those groups. The model features rent splitting, on-the-job search and twosided heterogeneity in productivity. It is estimated using German microdata. I nd that female workers are less productive and more mobile than males. Female workers have on average slightly lower bargaining power than their male counterparts. The total gender wage gap is 42 percent. It turns out that most of the gap, 65 percent, is accounted for by dierences in productivity, 17 percent of this gap is driven by segregation while dierences in destruction rates explain 9 percent of the total wage-gap. Netting out dierences in oer-arrival rates would increase the gap by 13 percent. Due to dierences in wage setting, female workers receive wages 9 percent lower than male ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cristian Bartolucci (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: