Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This topical collection highlights conversation's role in understanding critical code studies, indicating its importance in analysis.
We introduce our co-edited topical collection on Critical Code Studies and Code Conversations with an argument for conversation’s centrality to the discipline of critical code studies as a mode of engagement and understanding. We move towards a definition of a conversational method by highlighting moments from our own experience of code reading and from the discipline’s foundational literatures where analysis is made possible by and expressed through conversation. Following this, we develop an account of the conversation’s particular affordances for critical code studies, which come about through attention to positionality, temporality, and distance. We conclude with an overview of the articles which make up our topical collection, each of which contributes to a kaleidoscopic vision of conversational critical code studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carroll et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: