Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consensus statements address non-seizure issues in Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes, highlighting treatment options and impacts.
BACKGROUND: Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) are rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) in which disability and family burden are driven by seizures and non-seizure issues (NSIs), including cognition, behavior, sleep, communication, motor function, and adaptive abilities. OBJECTIVE: To develop practical consensus statements on NSIs in DS and LGS, integrating NSI evaluation within a DEE framework and appraising the perceived role of fenfluramine (FFA). METHODS: An Italian panel of 12 epilepsy specialists spanning pediatric and adult practice developed statements using an Estimate-Talk-Estimate process. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 70% agreement (agree/strongly agree). RESULTS: Eleven final statements were clustered into three macro-areas, with the first two explored in greater depth: (1) the cross-cutting, lifespan impact of NSIs in DS and LGS; (2) the potential for FFA to provide clinically meaningful benefits across selected NSI domains in DS and, more variably, in LGS, with effects not always fully captured by seizure metrics; and (3) the role of other interventions on NSIs and the need for structured assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating NSI priorities into shared goal-setting and longitudinal monitoring may improve the clinical relevance of care in DS and LGS. The panel supported an NSI-informed, net-benefit approach to treatment optimization and identified FFA as a relevant option, while recognizing that evidence on NSI outcomes remains heterogeneous and should be strengthened through syndrome-specific, longitudinal assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gennaro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: