Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review evaluates critical mathematics education practices, linking theory to classroom actions, suggesting improvements for teaching effectiveness.
Materials supporting a PRISMA 2020 systematic review of 52 empirical studies on critical mathematics education, examining the pathway from the field's theory to its enacted classroom practice. The repository contains the review protocol, the Scopus search strategy and record set, screening decisions, the coding framework and completed extraction for all 52 included studies, and the criterion level MMAT 2018 quality appraisal. The review was not prospectively registered; the protocol was documented alongside rather than in advance of the search. Full texts of the included studies are not deposited because of copyright restrictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atilla ÖZDEMİR (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: