Qualitative study unveils trauma and self-perceptions in adult parachute kids, highlighting their challenges.
In an era marked by political unrest, environmental collapse, and digital oversaturation, the transnational phenomenon of parachute kids that emerged in the 1980s continues to today—from Asia to the West, particularly to the U.S. Often, these minors, sent here alone in the name of seeking educational opportunities, consciously and unconsciously carry their parents’ fantasy about life in the U.S. and the responsibility to fulfill the parents’ narcissistic expectations for their children to achieve dreams and wishes that they did not realize. Although there is still a lack of robust body of studies, the few that exist consistently point to both intra- and interpsychic/racial tension, isolation, and dissociation that adult parachute kids experience. The vulnerability of young age and lack of available parental object can often render parachute kids’ adjustment into the U.S. culture traumatic and fragmenting to a fragile nascent self. Narcissistic defense can easily become the default mechanism for these kids to survive and accommodate to the unduly external pressure and internal experience of profound aloneness, parental abandonment, shame, and racial displacement in relation to both the home culture and the U.S. culture, even in the age of advanced technology. I propose a concept of dual self-structures to deepen the understanding of the parachute kids’ intrapsychic experience and offer a unique theoretical and clinical formulation in linking the two authentic senses of self in adult parachute kids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirley Liao (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: