Assesses ICECAP-A for quality of life in the Japanese workforce, indicating its validity and application in health policies.
The ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) was developed to assess quality of life in terms of general well-being. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of ICECAP-A in the working population. A nationally representative sample of the Japanese working population was collected ( n = 9,243). The psychometric properties of the ICECAP-A were examined in relation to the five-level Euro Quality of Life Five-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), self-reported diseases, self-perceived symptoms, mental health (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), and subjective well-being (life satisfaction). The Japanese version of the ICECAP-A demonstrated good internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.84. The mean scores for ICECAP-A (Japan), ICECAP-A (UK), and EQ-5D-5L (Japan) were 0.74, 0.65, and 0.89, respectively. The ICECAP-A score was moderately correlated with the EQ-5D-5L score, the anxiety and depression dimension of EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, and mental health, and strongly correlated with life satisfaction. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L capture largely distinct aspects of quality of life, with ICECAP-A serving as a complement to EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L performed better in assessing self-reported diseases and self-perceived symptoms, whereas ICECAP-A outperformed EQ-5D-5L in assessing life satisfaction and various job-related factors. The Japanese version of ICECAP-A is a valid instrument for assessing capability well-being in the working population. Application of ICECAP-A in economic evaluations of public health policies and interventions may capture broader aspects of quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: