The Com is an emerging online harm ecosystem characterised by overlapping sexual exploitation, cyber offending, violence, and violent extremism. Despite growing operational concern, little empirical evidence exists on how children and young people become involved. We analysed clinical formulations for 16 children and young people referred to the UK Counter Terrorism Clinical Consultancy Service because of concerns about engagement with The Com. Drawing on multi-agency information, we examined presenting concerns, clinician-formulated pathways into engagement, and intervention strategies. Clinicians consistently identified interacting vulnerabilities involving trauma and disrupted attachment, mental ill health and neurodevelopmental conditions, social isolation, unmet belonging and identity needs, violent interests, and social reinforcement within online networks. Presenting concerns frequently reflected overlapping ‘victimisation’ and ‘perpetration’ roles. Intervention focused on formulation-led, multi-agency responses addressing underlying vulnerabilities. The findings suggest that vulnerabilities associated with engagement are largely shared across other forms of harm, but the participatory and hybrid nature of The Com accelerates escalation, requiring earlier, coordinated prevention and safeguarding responses. We suggest that “The Com” should perhaps not be the organising principle for any response framework; instead, responses may be better structured around the pattern and predominance of harms, recognising that named online communities are only one setting within a broader and rapidly evolving online harm ecology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clemmow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: