Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores virtue ethics to enhance moral judgment in education, suggesting its importance in technology fields.
As technological development grows more complex, questions have arisen about whether moral judgment and ethical responsibility are keeping pace with the rapid expansion of technical power. Scholars have described this condition as a “moral gap,” in which technological capabilities advance more quickly than the moral capacities needed to judge and act responsibly in relation to their use. This article approaches the moral gap as an educational challenge, with particular attention to how moral judgment is formed. The article examines why rule-based and outcome-focused approaches to ethics often fall short when technologies change rapidly and when their consequences are difficult to anticipate. It introduces virtue ethics as a framework that centers on moral judgment and character traits such as prudence, humility, and integrity. Contemporary cases from cybercrime and gene-editing controversies illustrate how gaps in moral formation can shape ethically troubling uses of technology. The analysis also considers higher education as an important site where students can reflect on ethical responsibility before entering professional roles. Attention to virtue-based ethical education, particularly in STEM and technology-related fields, helps clarify how moral responsibility can be sustained as technological power continues to expand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yinxia Yang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: