Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective case series assesses visual outcomes and feasibility of scleral buckling in retinal detachment, suggesting effective intervention.
Purpose To present the slit-lamp illumination and visualisation system for scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and assess its feasibility and postoperative outcomes. Methods In a retrospective, single-center, non-comparative case series, patients with subtotal RRD who underwent scleral buckling under a slit-lamp illumination system at Lariboisière Hospital, between May 2017 and May 2022, were included. Patients who underwent scleral buckling combined with vitrectomy, with a history of retinal surgery and with maculopathies interfering with visual acuity were excluded. The following preoperative data were collected: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number and location of retinal breaks, extend of the detachment, presence of macular detachment. The fundus was visualised using a quadraspheric lens, and the slit-lamp system integrated in the surgical microscope. Anatomical success rate, BCVA improvement and complications were collected. Results Forty-six eyes of 46 patients with a mean age of 43.2 ± 12.8 years, followed for 8.7 ± 8.3 months were included. No procedure was switched to vitrectomy during surgery. The single surgery success rate was 93.5% (43 eyes). Three eyes had to undergo vitrectomy due to vitreoretinal proliferation. BCVA improved from 0.63 ± 0.76 LogMAR (Snellen 20/80) before surgery to 0.33 ± 0.40 LogMAR (Snellen 20/40) after surgery (p=0.002). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were experienced by two and nine patients, respectively. Conclusion Scleral buckling using a surgical microscope with an integrated slit-lamp and a wide-angle contact lens is a feasible technique associated with satisfactory anatomical and functional outcomes. This approach was associated with a high single-surgery success rate and a manageable complication rate. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatzistergiou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: