Evaluates the effects of HDPE, LDPE, and PP on asphalt binder properties, suggesting improvements and risks for recycling applications.
Increasing plastic waste and limited recycling rates underscore the need for value-added recycling applications. Polymers commonly present in plastic waste streams, including packaging films, bottles, caps, and rigid containers, may provide a practical pathway for developing plastic-modified asphalt binder (PMAB) systems. In this study, virgin high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polypropylene (PP) were selected as reference modifiers to evaluate their intrinsic effects on performance grade (PG) 58-28 and PG 67-22 base binders. Conventional high-, intermediate-, and low-temperature gradings were complemented by ΔTc, the Christensen–Anderson R-value (R-value), the Glover–Rowe (G-R) parameter, Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS) fatigue analysis modeled via Viscoelastic Continuum Damage (VECD), rheological master curves, and extended Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) testing. Modification improved high-temperature grading and LAS-based fatigue response while increasing master-curve stiffness. However, ΔTc, G-R parameter, and extended BBR results indicated increased low-temperature cracking susceptibility. High-temperature grades increased by 3.4 °C, 2.8 °C, and 2.3 °C per percent HDPE, LDPE, and PP, respectively, whereas low-temperature grade losses reached 7.8 °C; HDPE produced the highest high-temperature grade improvement, while LDPE showed the greatest extended BBR grade loss, and PP exhibited the fastest physical hardening rate. These results provide a controlled binder-level baseline for evaluating HDPE, LDPE, and PP as modifiers for future PMAB development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarannum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: