Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how low-frequency vibrations impact degradation in sodium-ion batteries, suggesting significant effects on performance.
Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are promising alternatives to lithium-ion batteries because of their low cost and abundant resources. However, the effect of prior low-frequency mechanical vibration on subsequent cycling degradation remains poorly understood. This study investigates commercial 26,700 cylindrical SIBs subjected to low-frequency random vibration pre-treatment followed by stationary cycling. Capacity evolution, DCIR, EIS, IC analysis, and post-cycling SEM observations were used to compare control and vibration-pretreated cells. Vibration pre-treatment produced a slight initial increase in discharge capacity, accompanied by temporarily reduced polarization and increased electrochemical accessibility. During subsequent cycling, the vibration-pretreated cells exhibited faster capacity fade and greater internal-resistance growth, with larger DCIR differences in the low- and high-SOC regions. EIS and IC results indicate aggravated interfacial polarization, charge-transfer limitation, diffusion limitation, and reaction heterogeneity. SEM observations after cycling reveal more pronounced surface irregularities and crack-like features in the vibration-pretreated electrodes, particularly on the anode, consistent with the electrochemical degradation trends. Together, the electrochemical measurements and post-cycling surface observations show that prior low-frequency vibration increased the subsequent degradation of the tested commercial 26,700 cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: