Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses the impact of clinical indicators on survival in metastatic prostate cancer, highlighting their prognostic value.
OBJECTIVE: Ra) and enzalutamide combination therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ra and enzalutamide at 14 hospitals and had pretreatment bone scintigraphy findings available for analysis. Associations of overall survival (OS) with clinicopathological factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA doubling time, automated bone scan index (aBSI), and previous chemotherapy history, were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank testing. RESULTS: Ra. The mean follow-up period was 21.9 months (range, 3.9-62.9 months), during which 35 patients (49.3%) died. Univariate analysis demonstrated that low hemoglobin (<12g/dL, P<0.0001), high PSA (≥20ng/mL, P<0.0001), ALP above the normal range (P=0.0067), and high aBSI (≥2.0%, P=0.0006) were significantly associated with shorter OS. In multivariable analysis, low hemoglobin [hazard ratio (HR) 5.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.32-14.2, P<0.0001] and high PSA (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.07-9.78, P=0.037) were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: Ra and enzalutamide combination therapy, pretreatment hemoglobin and PSA levels may serve as useful surrogate biomarkers for predicting overall survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitajima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: